For me, there are ancient terminologies used here which for period's sake is pretty accurate, but in the name of avoiding confusion I wouldn't necessarily use these words if I'm asked to give a breakdown explanation. As far as I'm concerned ALL-THAT-IS is too large for a real 3D name to work/feel right or be worthy of common use. So, despite agreeing with this video nearly completely.. Abraxas is just not a name I'll be using anytime soon (as in 'at all'). The name is JUST a product of it's ancient mystic's era.
Most humans are still learning through TRAUMA (in fairness it IS THE POINT of this frequency-dimension). Including plenty of light workers and starseeds.. (Imagine the regular humans). Most relationships are teaching us in some cases, nothing more than what we don’t want to be, and we failed to confirm that we don’t want to be it. That’s mostly all relationships, which we have to approach with as much clarity as possible coupled with patience (cuz you might have to do that relationship 10 times — lets you know not much clarity) AND DISCERNMENT. In fact, this video is more important than “idealistic” relationships (idealistic, almost to the point of being fake). For the full video…
(View Either Uploaded Video or Link)
