For me, there are ancient terminologies used here which for period's sake is pretty accurate, but in the name of avoiding confusion I wouldn't necessarily use these words if I'm asked to give a breakdown explanation. As far as I'm concerned ALL-THAT-IS is too large for a real 3D name to work/feel right or be worthy of common use. So, despite agreeing with this video nearly completely.. Abraxas is just not a name I'll be using anytime soon (as in 'at all'). The name is JUST a product of it's ancient mystic's era.
For the full interview click this link:
…experiences to assign purpose and meaning to—don’t allow your own created definitions destroy you, though, AND DO NOT JUDGE YOURSELF ABOUT THIS. This is the nature of all 3D (and even higher levels — albeit with more balance and peace, BUT STILL DRAMA). Why would you beat yourself over something that’s completely natural? However, granted, this all can feel heavily convoluted to the point where we doubt we’ll ever get passed anything far enough to get to some ascension point. There’s one simple (but not necessarily easy) remedy to that. You just have to learn to calm down and relax (meditation). Keep working on that!
